Showing posts with label unfair. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unfair. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 20, 2023
I asked OpenAI:
"Could one opine current risk weighted bank capital requirements help make what’s perceived as creditworthy to be even more worthy of credit, and what’s perceived as risky as even less worthy of credit? If so, is this fair access to bank credit?"
OpenAI answered:
"Current risk-weighted bank capital requirements aim to make what is perceived as creditworthy more worthy of credit and what is perceived as risky less worthy of credit. The underlying principle is to allocate capital based on the assessed risk of different assets or exposures. This approach recognizes that not all assets carry the same level of risk, and banks should hold higher capital against riskier assets.
The intention is to promote a more accurate assessment of creditworthiness and enhance the safety and stability of the banking system. By assigning higher capital requirements to riskier assets, such as loans to borrowers with weaker credit profiles, banks are incentivized to exercise prudence in lending decisions and ensure they have adequate capital buffers to absorb potential losses.
However, the fairness of access to bank credit can be a complex issue. While risk-weighted capital requirements aim to promote responsible lending and risk management, they can have unintended consequences. Here are a few considerations:
1. Differential Treatment: Risk weighting can lead to different capital requirements for different types of assets, borrowers, or industries. This may result in differential access to credit, with certain borrowers or sectors facing higher borrowing costs or reduced availability of credit. Smaller businesses or those with riskier profiles may find it more challenging to obtain loans or face higher interest rates, potentially affecting their ability to grow and compete.
2. Pro-Cyclicality: Risk-weighted capital requirements can contribute to pro-cyclical behavior in lending. During economic downturns, the perceived riskiness of assets may increase, leading to higher capital requirements and reduced lending capacity. This can exacerbate the economic downturn by restricting credit availability when it is most needed.
3. Complexity and Subjectivity: Risk weighting relies on complex models and assumptions to determine the riskiness of assets. These models may have inherent limitations and can be subject to interpretation and manipulation. The subjectivity involved in risk assessment introduces the possibility of misjudgment or bias, which may affect the fairness of credit allocation.
To address these concerns, policymakers and regulators should strive for a balance between risk sensitivity and fairness in access to credit. This may involve regular review and refinement of risk-weighted approaches, ensuring that they accurately reflect the underlying risks and that the models used are transparent, robust, and subject to independent validation.
Additionally, policymakers can explore complementary measures to support fair access to credit, such as promoting financial inclusion initiatives, encouraging responsible lending practices, and fostering competition in the banking sector.
Ultimately, the goal is to strike a balance between promoting financial stability through risk-based capital requirements and ensuring that credit is accessible to deserving borrowers without unnecessary barriers or biases."
Note: The answers are copied exactly from those given to me by OpenAI
Monday, October 12, 2015
Fair and equitable growth has been made impossible by current bank regulations.
Even though banks already take into consideration the perceived credit risks when setting their interest rates and amount of exposure the regulators also use exactly the same perceived risk when setting the capital requirements.
And that means the banks’ sensitivity to perceived credit risk, is multiplied by two.
So what is perceived as safe will now mean doubly perceived as safe, and so it will have even more access to bank credit; and what is perceived as risky will now mean doubly perceived as risky, and so it will have even less access to bank credit.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)