Tuesday, August 12, 2014
We believe that banks should give larger loans, on lower
interest rates and on softer terms than usual, to those who are ex ante perceived
as “absolutely safe”, like the infallible sovereigns and the AAA-ristocracy; and
that they should give smaller loans, at higher interest rates and on harsher terms
than usual, to those who are ex ante perceived as risky, like medium and small
businesses, entrepreneurs and start-ups… so that we can go home and sleep
calmly.
Since that could expose us to accusations of being discriminatory, we
believe that the risk-weighted capital requirements for banks, by which we allow
banks to earn higher risk-adjusted returns on equity when lending to the “absolutely
safe” than when lending to “the risky”, is the least transparent and therefore the most effective regulatory pillar by which we can reach our objectives.
And, to those who might criticize us we say… we believe it is not our role to guarantee an efficient allocation of bank credit so
that the economy grows sturdy and stays healthy… that is definitely somebody
else’s business.