Thursday, April 27, 2023
I asked OpenAI:
"How much must bank regulators know about risks, before they should be allowed to introduce risk weighted bank capital/equity requirements?"
OpenAI answered:
"Bank regulators should have a thorough understanding of the risks that banks face before introducing risk-weighted bank capital/equity requirements. This includes understanding the nature of different types of risks, such as credit risk, market risk, operational risk, and liquidity risk, as well as the ways in which these risks can interact with each other.
Regulators should also have a good understanding of how banks manage and mitigate these risks, and the potential unintended consequences of introducing risk-weighted capital requirements. For example, if capital requirements are too high, it could discourage banks from lending to small and medium-sized enterprises or investing in certain types of assets, which could have a negative impact on the economy.
In addition, regulators should have a strong understanding of the financial system as a whole and the potential systemic risks that could arise from the failure of a large bank or a significant disruption in financial markets.
Therefore, it is important for regulators to have a strong expertise in finance and risk management, as well as access to high-quality data and analysis, before introducing risk-weighted bank capital/equity requirements. This can help ensure that the regulations are effective in promoting financial stability while also minimizing unintended consequences."
Note: The answers are copied exactly from those given to me by OpenAI
PS: My comments:
As a minimum minimorum they should not have missed the lectures on conditional probabilities.
“The boundary between modern times and the past, is mastery of risk; for those who believed everything was in God’s hands, risk management must have seemed quite irrelevant” Peter L. Bernstein. Seeing what bank regulators have done, we’ve left out God’s hand, way too much.